Lifestyle medicine

@#There is now an epidemiologic shift in the burden of illness from infectious diseases in the last century to lifestyle diseases in the current. Mortality due to lifestyle diseases like diabetes, hypertension and heart disease is now ranked higher than infections. The medical community is now realizing the importance of lifestyle intervention to address the problem. We hope that this issue of our journal focused on lifestyle medicine will help inform our colleagues in family and community practice the necessity and available strategy of lifestyle intervention. Lifestyle Medicine is the use of evidence-based lifestyle therapeutic approaches, including a whole food, plant-based eating pattern, regular physical activity, restorative sleep, stress management, the avoidance of risky substances, and positive social connection as a primary modality delivered by trained and certified clinicians, to prevent, treat, and often reverse chronic disease.1 It is distinct from other disciplines, such as functional, integrative, complementary, and alternative medicine. Lifestyle medicine focuses on conditions that consume 80% of healthcare visits, hospitalizations, and costs. Hence, it is recommended as the first line and the foundational intervention for non-communicable diseases that address the modifiable lifestyle and behavioral risk factors impacting the disease trajectory, quality of life, and overall health outcomes.2 Despite the advances and increasing availability of medical care, these chronic lifestyle-borne diseases continued to increase exponentially, causing 74% of all deaths globally.2 However, healthcare providers do not receive adequate education, foundational skills, and personal experiential references to efficiently prescribe the recommended lifestyle therapy in primary and specialty care. Thus, lifestyle medicine initiatives align with the quadruple healthcare aims to deliver better patient experience, better outcomes, lower costs, and better clinician satisfaction.3 Through the lifestyle medicine lens and the empowerment of patients, healthcare providers often bring whole health management and disease remission into the scope of care at a lower cost. Lifestyle is an individual’s choice. The study by Longakit reveals an individual choice of lifestyle practice for wellness elements like physical, social and emotional state. While the study of Alimorong is a an individual’s choice when he or she has health risk like hypertension. Physicians should be able to influence this patient’s choice and there are several strategies available. The case studies of Solijon, Acero and Tan are different strategic methods to promote lifestyle change. The interventions given are usually structured and conducted face-to-face. On the other hand, the studies of Cristobal and Ngo uses digital health interventions to promote lifestyle change. While the studies on lifestyle interventions presented in this issue are not robust evidence like randomized trials, these are experiences by local physicians with their patients. These experience may be a good enough basis to increase awareness and provide training for family and community physicians on lifestyle medicine, as advocated by the study of Palma.

Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Dyspnea in primary care and outpatient setting

Background@#Dyspnea also referred to as shortness of breath or breathlessness is defined as “a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations that vary in intensity.” Dyspnea is a symptom of the disease, rather than a disease itself. Its etiology can be designated as arising from four primary categories: respiratory, cardiac, neuromuscular, psychogenic, systemic illness, or a combination of these.@*Objective@#The general objective in developing this guideline is to improve the quality and outcomes of care to adult patients with dyspnea or shortness of breath in primary care and outpatient setting.@*Methods@#The ADAPTE process was utilized in the development of the initial guideline recommendations where the following steps were followed: 1) definition of clinical questions, 2) searching, screening and appraisal of guidelines, 3) decision and selection of evidence and 4) iterative drafting of guideline recommendation was done. The retrieved guidelines were systematically evaluated for their quality and validity using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II Instrument, which is a tool developed to assess the methodological quality of practice guidelines. If the adopted guideline did not have recommendations for our clinical question, we developed the recommendations de novo using the GRADE approach. We prioritized retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles that are relevant to our clinical questions. In the development of recommendations, the guideline development team prioritized the interventions that address the following outcomes i.e., decrease in severity of dyspnea, resolution of dyspnea, improved quality of life and decrease mortality. Data from the articles were extracted and the evidence was then summarized and appraised based on the type of study. The recommendations were then developed by the team as the initial draft that was subjected to external review and consensus panel discussion for finalization.

Occupational health: COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic era

@#The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted into issues on occupational health, especially in health care services sector. Due to the nature of their work, this sector is at an increased risk of exposure to the virus. In this issue, we further discuss the importance of occupational health as our special theme. Occupational Health is an area of work in public health to promote the highest degree of physical, mental, and social well-being of workers in all occupations. Occupational health deals with all aspects of health and safety in the workplace and has a strong focus on primary prevention of hazards. The Philippine College of Occupational Medicine (PCOM), which is an affiliate specialty society of the PAFP, is responsible for promoting occupational health in the country. PCOM, formerly known as the Philippine Occupational and Industrial Medical Association (POIMA), was established in 1977 through the merger of three occupational health associations, namely the Industrial Medical Association of the Philippines (IMAP), the Philippine Association of Occupational Health (PAOH), and the Philippine Association of Compensation Medicine (PACOM). As a medical specialty society and a DOLE-accredited safety and health training organization, PCOM is a prime mover in the preservation, promotion, protection, and enhancement of health, safety and wellness of workers in all occupations through its active members nationwide and collaboration with various stakeholders both locally and internationally.

Clinical practice guideline and pathway for the evaluation and management of children with diarrhea in family and community practice

Background@#Diarrhea is among the common causes of morbidity and mortality in children. It is defined as the passage of three or more loose or liquid stools per day (or more frequent passage than is normal for the individual). It does not include frequent passing of formed stool and passing of loose, pasty stools by breastfed babies. It is usually a symptom of an infection in the intestinal tract, caused by variety of organisms, which is spread through contaminated food or drinking water, or from person-to-person as a result of poor hygiene. Diarrhea can last several days and can leave the body without the water and salts that are necessary for survival causing significant number of mortality and morbidity among children. At the level of primary care, diagnosis, management and treatment of food- and waterborne-diseases, which commonly present as diarrhea, lack the necessary protocols and standards, thus, the creation of this clinical pathway. @*Objective@#The main goal of this clinical pathway was to provide guidance to family and community physicians, and other primary care physicians in managing acute diarrhea among immunocompetent pediatric patients.@*Methods@#ADAPTE process was used in CPG development. Existing guidelines on acute diarrhea among pediatric patients were retrieved and appraised using the AGREE II tool. Recommendation statements from the guidelines that passed the AGREE II tool were reviewed. Recommendation statements that will help answer the clinical questions posed in the creation of the clinical pathway were adapted. For clinical questions were not answered by the available guideline recommendations, a de novo method was conducted. The adapted recommendation statements and the supporting summary of evidences were sent for external review prior to consensus development. Suggestions provided in both steps were discussed and incorporated in the final manuscript, as appropriate.@*Key Recommendation Statements@#These key recommendation statements addressing the clinical assessment, diagnosis, interventions (pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic), and patient outcomes that are relevant in the outpatient or primary care setting in the Philippines were based on the summarized key evidences from the systematic review of literature conducted using the ADAPTE process. Clinical Assessment Recommendation 1. A focused medical history that includes questions on duration, frequency, characteristics, associated symptoms, consumption of raw, ill-prepared, or rotten food; intake of antibiotics, contaminated food or water; and history of travel should be obtained. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 2. Physical examination should be done to assess the nutritional status, degree of dehydration, severity of disease, and presence of complications and comorbid conditions. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 3. Degree of dehydration should be classified into No Dehydration, Mild to Moderate Dehydration, or Severe Dehydration. (Weak recommendation, Moderate quality evidence) Recommendation 4. Children with acute infectious diarrhea who have any of the following conditions should be admitted to the hospital: severe dehydration, inability to tolerate fluids orally, suspected electrolyte abnormalities, altered consciousness, abdominal distention, respiratory distress, pneumonia, meningitis/encephalitis, sepsis, moderate to severe malnutrition, suspected surgical condition, or conditions for safe follow-up and home management are not met. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Diagnostic Tests Recommendation 5. Routine diagnostic tests are not necessary among children with acute diarrhea. (Strong recommendation, Low quality evidence) Recommendation 6. Stool examination may only be requested if the patient present with moderate to severe condition, bloody diarrhea, or amoebiasis and parasitism is being considered at time of epidemic. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 7. Diagnostic tests may be requested if concomitant conditions like pneumonia, urinary tract infection, sepsis or meningitis are suspected; or if abdominal distension is observed post-hydration. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 8. Stool culture, serologic test, rapid diagnostic test, PCR determination and serum biomarkers are not recommended in family and community practice. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Pharmacologic Treatment Recommendation 9. Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution (ORS), commercial or home-made is recommended to replace previous and ongoing losses. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 10. The volume and frequency of reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution (ORS) should be dependent on patient’s age or weight, severity of dehydration and ongoing losses. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 11. Severe dehydration should be managed in the hospital with intravenous hydration. (Strong recommendation, High quality of evidence) Recommendation 12. Routine empiric antibiotic treatment is not recommended in children with acute infectious diarrhea. (Strong recommendation, Very low quality evidence) Recommendation 13. Antibiotic treatment may be given to children with Cholera, Shigella, typhoidal Salmonella, amoebiasis, and giardiasis. The choice of antibiotic must be guided by the local Antibiotic Surveillance Program. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 14. In general, antibiotic treatment should not be given in children with non-typhoidal Salmonella. It may be given in children with underlying conditions i.e., immunodeficiency, corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy. (Strong recommendation, Very low quality evidence) Recommendation 15. Among children older than six months, zinc supplementation of 10-20 mg per day for 10-14 days may be offered to reduce the duration and severity of diarrhea, and recurrence in the next two to three months (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 16. Racecadotril may be offered to reduce ongoing loss of water and electrolytes. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 17. Probiotics may be offered to reduce the duration of diarrhea. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), Saccharomyces boulardii and Lactobacillus reuteri are strains with evidence of effectiveness. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 18. Anti-emetics and antidiarrheal drugs are generally not recommended because of their side-effects. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Non-pharmacologic Interventions Recommendation 19. Among children with acute diarrhea, age-appropriate feeding should be continued. There is no need to modify or restrict diet. (Strong recommendation, Moderate quality of evidence) Recommendation 20. Among infants with diarrhea, breastfeeding must be continued. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) Recommendation 21. If diet was restricted because of frequent vomiting, early refeeding must be done. (Strong recommendation, Moderate quality evidence) Recommendation 22. All members of the family must be encouraged regular hand washing with soap and water. (Strong recommendation, Moderate quality evidence) Recommendation 23. Family members must observe proper food handling, have access to safe drinking water, and observe proper waste disposal. (Strong recommendation, Low quality evidence) Recommendation 24. Community level intervention that encourages hand washing, proper food handling, appropriate waste disposal and ensuring safe drinking water must be done. (Strong recommendation, Low quality evidence) Expected Patient Outcomes Recommendation 25. After each encounter the patient or guardian must understand the nature of acute diarrhea, its management and potential complications. (Strong recommendation, Low quality evidence) Recommendation 26. The management plan must be a mutual agreement between the family physician and the guardian. (Strong recommendation, Low quality evidence) Recommendation 27. For the management of a child with acute diarrhea, the family physician must target for resolution of dehydration, resolution of diarrhea, prevention of relapse, hospitalization, complications and early detection of adverse events. (Strong recommendation, High quality evidence) @*Dissemination and Implementation@#This clinical pathway will be published in the “The Filipino Family Physician” journal, which is accessible in the PAFP journal website. PAFP’s Committee on Research will disseminate the clinical pathway through distribution to its subspecialty and affiliate societies, chapters, training programs, and primary care practitioners; and continuing development sessions of the PAFP. Monitoring of the uptake of the clinical pathway will be through the number of downloads at the website and requests for copies. This clinical pathway may be used as a guide by family and community physician and primary care physicians in a primary care setting. Tabular presentation of the clinical pathway was included as a tool for implementation. Monitoring of implementation will be via continuous quality improvements activities, which can be a self-initiated activity of the member as recommended in the Universal Healthcare, or as a chapter or group activity.

Clinical practice guideline and pathways for the evaluation and management of patients with dizziness in family and community practice

Background@#Dizziness is a commonly encountered symptom in the primary care which can be caused, most of the time by benign condition and rarely due to serious conditions needing higher level of care.@*Objective@#To develop a clinical guideline and pathway that will serve as guide in the diagnosis and management of adult patients with dizziness in primary care and outpatient setting@*Methods@#A guideline development team was formed which is composed of family and community medicine specialists from different institutions. Searching, selection and assessment of the latest evidence on dizziness diagnosis and management was done using the search terms: “dizziness”, “diagnosis”, “management”, and “primary care”. Formulation of the recommendation was done using Grade approach and graded with modified GRADEPro and expert panel consensus. External review was also done by an expert in otorhinolaryngology.@*Recommendations@#Clinical Assessment •Recommendation1.Askforthepatient’sdescriptionofdizzinessandclassifythepatientintooneofthefourtypes: vertigo, presyncope, disequilibrium, and lightheadedness and classify as acute/episodic or chronic/sustained. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation2.Obtainamedicalhistoryfocusingonthetiming,triggers,associatedsymptoms,riskfactorsfor atherosclerotic vascular disease, and functional status or quality of life. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation3.Performaphysicalexaminationfocusingonvitalsigns,HEENT(includingotoscopy),cardiovascular and neurologic examination. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation4.PerformspecialphysicalexaminationslikeDix-Hallpikemaneuverforacuteepisodictriggeredvertigo to check for BPPV (most common cause of peripheral vertigo), HINTS plus test for spontaneous episodic vertigo to check for stroke and hyperventilation provocation test for patients suspected of anxiety (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation5.Elicitredflagsthatshouldwarrantreferrallikeseveredizzinessandassociated,alteredmentalstatus, loss of consciousness and abnormal vital signs. Other symptoms like chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea, neurologic deficit may warrant referral for evaluation and management. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation6.Forpatientsconsultingviatelemedicine,obtainamedicalhistoryfocusingonthetiming,triggers, associated symptoms, risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease, and functional status or quality of life, and observe and conduct self-physical examination (vital signs, mental status, ocular and facial nerve) (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) Diagnostic •Recommendation7.Laboratorytestingisnotroutinelyrecommendedamongpatientswithdizziness.However,testingmay be requested if there is a need to identify a definite etiology to guide treatment and should be guided by the classification of dizziness, possible etiology, and the medical history and physical examination. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence).Recommendation8.Forpatientswithvertigoandwithauditorysymptoms(i.e.,hearingloss,tinnitusandauralfullness, etc.), pure tone audiometry speech test may be requested if available. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation9.Forpatientswithpresyncope/syncopeandachronicmedicalconditionisbeingconsidered,complete blood count may be requested for those with probable blood dyscrasia, serum blood glucose may be requested for those with diabetes, electrocardiogram and lipid profile may be requested for those with cardiovascular disease. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation10.Forpatientswithdisequilibriumandwithanabnormalneurologicphysicalexaminationfinding,CT scan may be requested. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) Pharmacologic •Recommendation11.Empirictrialofshortcourse(7days)pharmacologictreatmentforsymptomreliefshouldbeoffered. Referral should be considered if the dizziness become more severe or it did not improve in 7 days. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation12.Forpatientswithmildtomoderatevertigo,offerhistamineanalogue(betahistine)orantihistamine (meclizine, diphenhydramine, dimenhydrinate or cinnarizine) for symptom relief. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation13.Forpatientswithmildtomoderatevertigoassociatedwithmigraine(vestibularmigraine),aside from symptom relief, offer any of the triptans as preventive medication. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation14.Forpatientswhosedizzinessisdescribedasdisequilibrium(gaitimbalance)orpresyncope(near faintness) or dizziness with anxiety attack, offer symptomatic treatment and intervention based on the underlying cause or consider referral to appropriate specialist. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) Non-pharmacologic •Recommendation15.Allpatientsshouldbeprovidedwithhealtheducationoncauses,triggersandfollowup.(Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation16.Allpatientsshouldbeadvisedonappropriatedietandlifestylemodification.(StrongRecommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation17.Dependingonthenatureofvertigo,educateandtrainthepatientoncanalrepositioningmaneuver and vestibular rehabilitation. Referral to rehabilitation medicine may be considered. (Strong Recommendation, High Quality Evidence) •Recommendation18.Thepatient’sfamilymustalsobeprovidedwithhealtheducationandidentifyacaregivertoassist and promote compliance to management. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) •Recommendation19.Encouragecommunity-basedvestibularrehabilitationactivitiessuchasgroupbalancetraining exercise. (Strong Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence) Patient Outcomes •Recommendation20.Thepatientshouldknowthenatureofdizziness,causesandpotentialcomplicationsanddevelop skills in postural exercises. (Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence) •Recommendation21.Decreaseinfrequencyandseverityshouldexpectedwithin48hoursandresolutionisexpectedwithin a month. (Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence) •Recommendation22.Improvedqualityoflifeshouldalsobeelicited.(StrongRecommendation,ModerateQualityEvidence) •Recommendation23.Referraltoappropriatespecialtyshouldbedoneifnoresolutionorprogressionofsymptomsor impaired quality of life for more than a month. (Strong Recommendation, Expert Opinion)@*Implementation@#The committee shall disseminate the guidelines through presentations and via journal publications. The QA committee shall be in charge of implementation of the guideline and pathway.

Primary care services in the UHC: Cost identification study

Background@#In order to financially sustain the participation of the private sector in the UHC, there is a need to find reasonable balance of accountability in the costing of health services. The costing must be based on actual resources used from the perspective of the private health service provider. @*Objective@#The objective of this paper was to determine the cost of primary care services from the framework of the UHC reform in the private sector.@*Method@#This is a multi-method approach to cost-identification in establishing and providing primary care health service in the UHC. The approaches used by the authors included review of published literature, laws and policies from DOH and other regulatory agencies. From this review, they develop the minimum facility requirement for basic primary care facility and primary care facility with ancillary services. They used the actual expenditures of existing primary care clinics, 2021 quotations from equipment and supplies companies, published construction rates and consensus approach to establish the cost. Based on 2021 value of Philippine Peso, they estimated the cost of constructing and operating a primary care facility.@*Results@#The total estimated cost of building a primary health care facility based on the DOH licensing standard was estimated to be around PhP2,490,000. The cost of furniture and equipment as required in the DOH AO was PhP474,685. Thus, the total cost of the construction and equipment for a basic primary care facility setup is PhP2,964,685. We estimated the annual operating cost with the building estimated to depreciate in 20 years and the furniture and equipment in 5 years, the annualized cost for the building is PhP124,500 and for the furniture and equipment PhP94,937. The total annual salary of the staff based on government standards was PhP2,381,962. The maintenance, operating and overhead expenses (MOOE) which included water and electricity, repair and maintenance, waste disposal, supplies and other fees was PhP451,190. The total annual operating cost of a basic primary care facility is PhP3,052,590. This facility can provide basic services such as outpatient consultation and minor surgeries. Using the same approach for the basic facility, the total annual operating cost of a basic primary care facility with ancillary service is PhP11,023,670. This facility can provide outpatient consultation, minor surgeries and primary care services such as health education and preventive care plus the ancillary services like pharmacy, clinical laboratory and x-ray. For patients with diabetes, the total annual cost is PhP8,986. The significant cost driver is the clinical assessment and non-pharmacologic intervention. The researchers found the same cost pattern for the annual cost care of patients with hypertension but with a slightly higher annual total with PhP9,963. Their sensitivity analysis based on inflation, construction, equipment and operating expense may increase these cost estimates by 20% in the next 5 years. @*Conclusion@#Based on their findings, the current per capita support from PHIC Konsulta package is not adequate in the private sector both for wellness and care of patients with chronic condition. PHIC needs to consider adjusting per capita rates and consider case rate payment as it is currently doing for hospital care. Without this proposed adjustment, only those patients in the higher socioeconomic status will be capable of consulting the private sector. This scenario defeats the equity issue that is a primary concern in the UHC.

Informing patients about disease prognosis

@#Prognosis refers to the development of possible “outcome” of disease i.e., survival in patient with cancer. Prognostic factors are characteristics of a particular patient that can be used to predict that patient’s eventual outcome i.e., patients with advanced TNM cancer stage may have lower probability of survival than those with less advance TNM cancer stage. Thus, prognosis is a prediction of the probable outcome of a disease based on a individual’s condition and the usual course of the disease as seen in similar situations. Family physicians are often asked by patients about the probable course of their disease, they need skills on how to inform patients about this.

Risk factors that patients should avoid

@#A risk factor increases a person’s susceptibility to developing a disease. This can be a particular patient characteristic (e.g., obesity for heart disease), patient behavior (e.g., cigarette smoking for lung cancer), or a specific drug intervention (e.g., steroid intake for myopathy). Observational studies like case-control or cohort study designs are commonly used when evaluating the harmful effect of an exposure. Family and community medicine practitioners should always take the opportunity to advice patients regarding these risk factors to promote wellness and enhance primary care.

Using a clinical practice guideline for making clinical decisions

@#Clinical practice guideline is defined as “statements that include recommendations intended to optimize patient care that are informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options”. It includes recommendations that are intended to optimize patient care. They are the best source of evidence for busy clinicians and may be the most efficient type of evidence to guide decision making in family practice.

Critical appraisal

@#Critical appraisal is the process of reading published research to make a judgement on its scientific value (validity), and to consider how its results can be applied in family and community practice (applicability). There are four main elements of critical appraisal in EBFP i.e., relevance, validity, results, and applicability. Some family practitioners are not so comfortable with appraisal because of their poor background in research. But we developed the guide questions for critical appraisal simple and provide advice on what and where to look for it in the published evidence.

Searching for the right evidence

@#Literature search is a systematic and well-organized search from published data to identify good quality references on a specific topic. The search can be a simple involving just a couple of sources and done within an hour or so. It can also be comprehensive and thorough where it involves multiple sources. However, in EBFP main purpose of a literature search is to obtain only a few available but relevant and high-quality evidence that can help the family practitioner make a clinical decision. The first step in making evidence-based decision is to convert the clinical problem for decision-making into a clinical question. It should be phrased in a simple sentence that is relevant and specific to the clinical problem, interesting enough to warrant searching for the answer and will likely obtain the article to answer the question. Based on the formulated clinical question discussed previously, identifying the key terms to be used for the search is the next step. The key terms are usually based on the PICO or its variants, POEM, SPICE or ECLIPSE elements in the clinical question. Since it will only be a simple search in EBFP, it is recommended to look in PubMed. PubMed is the online version of Index Medicus produced by the US National Library of Medicine (NLM). If the article is not available in PubMed, Google Scholar is another free web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly literature across an array of publication formats and disciplines. Other advice for an efficient literature search is also discussed.

Introduction to evidence-based family practice

@#While the definition of EBM can be straightforward in other medical field, family and community medicine practitioners take on very different roles in different health systems. Despite the challenges presented, EBM is still necessary in family and community practice. Family and community medicine practitioners must be able to obtain, assess, apply and integrate new knowledge based on available evidence throughout their professional life. From the definition of EBM and the nature of family practice described previously, we propose to define “Evidence-based Family Practice as the conscientious and judicious use of the current, relevant, applicable and best available evidence in making shared clinical decisions for patient care. Such decisions must account for the capacity and setting of the family practitioner and patient preference”. The proposed steps are: 1) Framing the Clinical Problem, 2) Searching for the Evidence, 3) Critical Appraisal, 4) Informing the Patient About the Evidence, 5) Shared Decision Making, and 6) Evaluation of the Decision.

Continuous quality improvement for family and community practice in UHC

@#Quality health care is one of the central themes in the reform areas of the Universal Health Care (UHC). But in low- and middleincome countries like the Philippines, quality of health care is suboptimal. There are several challenges in implementing quality improvement in family and community practice. These include a weak health system arising from inadequate human resource and capacity, low utilization of data for health care improvement, and minimal involvement of patients to demand better quality and safety. There are also barriers, such as lack of access to evidence-based medicine resources, poor insurance systems compound the complexity of addressing health care quality. While the PAFP has already done these trainings in the past and available experiences on primary care CQI initiatives published in the local literature, in this article, we propose simple steps in line with what may be the requirement of the UHC reform.

Diagnosis and management of uncomplicated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in family practice

Background@#The cost of DM treatment in the Philippines is mainly shouldered by the patient. Most patients rely on “outof-pocket” expenses, namely, laboratory procedures and daily medications. There are guidelines available, unfortunately its dissemination and implementation rely on passive strategies. This clinical pathway is an attempt to operationalize these guideline recommendations in family and community outpatient practice. @*Methods@#The PAFP Clinical Pathways Group reviewed the published medical literature to identify, summarize, and operationalize the evidence in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in family and community practice. The recommendations are time-bound tasks on patient care processes, in terms of history and physical examination, laboratory tests, pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions.@*Recommendations@#First Visit •Elicitsymptomsofhyperglycemiai.e.polyuria,polyphagia,polydipsia,nocturiaandweightloss(A-II) •Generalphysicalexaminationfocusoncardiac,renal,peripheralpulseretinopathy,neuropathy,skinandBMI(A-II) •ConductriskscreeningforasymptomaticandBMI≥25kg/m2or≥45yearsold(A-II) •RequestforFBSorRBSorOGTTorHgbA1C(A-I) •Notadvisabletogiveroutinevitaminsupplementationwithantioxidants,suchasvitaminsEandCandcarotene(A-I) •Structuredhealtheducationonlifestylechanges(alcoholandsmoking),moderateweightloss,regularphysicalactivity, reduced calories, sugar and dietary fat intake (A-III) •Arrangefordevelopmentandimplementationoffamily-focusedandcommunity-orientedintervention(A-III) •Patientisawareofdiabetestype2andmanagementplan(A-III) Second Visit •Reviewthelaboratoryresultsandestablishthediagnosisasdiabetestype2,pre-diabetesornon-diabetes(A-II) •Ifdiabetestype2orpre-diabetes,assessthepatientandfamily’sdietarypatterns,physicalactivityhabits,nutritionalstatus and weight history, diabetes understanding, psychological, social and community health support systems (A-III) •Evaluatesocialdeterminantsofhealth(SCREEM)(A_III) •Ifdiabetestype2,requestforlaboratoryteststodetectcomplicationortargetorgandamage(A-II).Ifnormal,repeat testing every year if there are risk factors and at least at 3-year intervals if there are no risk factors (B-III) •FirststepmedicationisMetformin500mgtwiceaday(A-I) •IfwithmarkedsymptomsandsignificantlyelevatedbloodglucoselevelsorA1C,considermetforminandinsulinfromthe outset (A-II) •Ifpre-diabetesmetformin500mgoncedailymaybeconsideredifthereisimpairedglucosetoleranceorimpairedfasting glucose or A1C of 5.7–6.4% (A-II) •Developandagreeonthemanagementplan(A-III) •Providediabetesself-managementeducationandcounselling(A-II) •Medicalnutritiontherapyfocusingonlimitationofcarbohydrateandfatintakeandweightloss(A-I) •Emphasizeincreaseinphysicalactivity(A-I) •Limitalcoholintake,smokingcessation(A-II) Involveafamilymember/caregiverinthediabetesself-managementeducationandcounselling,medicalnutritiontherapy, physical activity and limitation of alcohol intake (A-II) •Setupatelemedicineandotherdigitalapplicationtocomplementface-to-facemanagementofpatients(A-I) •Patientoutcomesare:1)agreeonmanagementplanandgoals,2)Awareonmedications,doseandsideeffects,3)aware on what to do if hyoglycemia occur (A-III) Continuing Care •Reviewoftreatmentregimens(medicationadherence,mealplan,physicalactivitypatterns,andlifestylechange)and response to treatment (self-monitoring or A1C records) (A-II) •Checkforhypoglycemicepisodesandotheradverseevents(A-II) •Randomorfastingbloodsugartestingduringclinicvisitmaybedonetoguidetimelytreatmentchanges(A-III) •A1Ctestquarterlyortwiceayeardependingonresponsetotreatment(A-III) •Basedoninitialresponse,titratemetformindosefor3monthstoachievetreatmentgoal(A-I).Ifthediabetesisnotcontrolled by metformin after 1 month add basal insulin or another oral hypoglycemic drugs (A-I) (be aware of contraindications) •Enhancediabetesself-managementeducationandcounselling,medicalnutritiontherapy,physicalactivityandlimitation of alcohol intake (A-II) •Enhancethefamilymember/caregiver’sroleinthediabetesself-managementeducationandcounselling,medicalnutrition therapy, physical activity and limitation of alcohol intake (A-II) •Coordinatereferralforsocialandeconomicsupportforthepatientifneeded(A-III) •Empowercommunityhealthworkersanddiabeticpatientsforcoordinationandmonitoring(A-III) •Patientoutcomesshouldbe:1)achievementoftreatmentgoals(A-I),2)improvedqualityoflife(A-I),3)satisfactionto management plan (A-III), 4) continuing compliance to diabetes self-management (A-III)@*Implementation@#We recommend that at the clinic level, self-reviews of chart records using the recommendations of this clinical pathway as the criteria may be done. Identification of barriers and developing interventions to promote compliance to the clinical pathway recommendations may be more effective.

Clinical pathway for the diagnosis and management of patients with COVID-19 in family practice

Background@#Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, causing a pandemic. The Philippines ranks 3rd in Southeast Asia with more than 15,000 confirmed cases, and a case fatality rate of 6.01%, close to the global average of 6.33%.@*Objective@#This clinical pathway was developed to guide family and community physicians on the diagnosis and initial management of COVID-19 in terms of 1) clinical history and physical examination; 2) laboratory and ancillary procedures to be requested; 3) pharmacologic interventions; 4) non-pharmacologic interventions, and 5) patient outcomes to expect.@*Method@#The PAFP Clinical Pathways Group reviewed the published medical literature to identify, summarize, and operationalize the evidence in clinical publication on the management of patients with COVID-19 in family and community practice.@*Recommendations@#The recommendations are time-bound tasks on patient care processes, in terms of history and physical examination, laboratory tests, pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions. The recommendations are presented as a table and algorithm.@*Implementation@#At the clinic level, self-audit using the recommendations of this clinical pathway as the standard may be done. At the organizational level, the PAFP should establish a new model of quality improvement initiative where self-practice audits are included as part of the program.

Primary care orientation of family practice in the Philippines: Cross-sectional study in pilot sites

Background@#Universal Health Care law calls for strong primary care where essential services are responsive to the health needs of individuals, families, and communities. Similar to other countries, family physicians are the biggest workforce in primary care, but little is known about the kind of care that they provide. This study aimed to determine the process of care rendered by family physicians in the country to assess their readiness in implementing the standards of primary care services according to the Universal Health Care law.@*Methods@#Cross-sectional survey using a questionnaire that includes 6 key elements of UHC was conducted to family physicians participating in the pilot project of the Philippine Academy of Family Physicians practice networks. Process of care is part of the big data collected in the survey. The process of care variables was analyzed using descriptive statistics.@*Results@#There were 195 family physicians who completed the survey. There were about 14.87% from Luzon, 18.46% from NCR, 27.18% from the Visayas, and 39.49% from Mindanao. Overall, the participants provide comprehensive, coordinated, and continuing care. Few utilized electronic medical records (9%). Preventive services provided are immunization (82.05%), alcohol and smoking cessation (77.44%), nutrition advice (76.92%), and exercise prescription (73.33%). @*Conclusion@#Family physicians in the pilot sites provide comprehensive, coordinated, and continuing care. The majority also offer common preventive services such as immunization, smoking cessation, nutrition advice, and exercise prescription. Some process needed for UHC needs improvement such as the use of EMR and quality assurance activities.

Readiness of family practice clinics to reforms in universal health care

Background@#Primary care providers must evaluate their facilities and determine their capacity to comply with the requirements of the Universal Health Care (UHC) Act.@*Objective@#This study describes the facility profiles of PAFP members in terms of the UHC requirements for licensing, certification and accreditation of health facilities.@*Methods@#A cross-sectional study was conducted in four cities using the PAFP UHC Readiness survey. The study population included active members of PAFP who voluntarily answered the survey during workshops held between January to February 2020@*Results@#A total of 195 family physicians participated. Most of them work in hospital facilities (49.40%), while others have solo practice (27.38%), or are in group practice (20.24%). Most (69.61%) of the facilities have PHIC accreditation and SEC or DTI registration (74.47%). The availability of structures, equipment and pharmacies vary across the cities. Only half of the facilities have information technologies for clinical records (54.36%) or management (59.49%). Similarly, there are facilities which lack human resource personnel and only 54.10% of the facilities are networked with other facilities. The facilities’ revenues are mostly from fee-for-service (60%) and the cost of payments widely vary among the areas. Most of the facilities are managed financially by the owner and the income of the facility is the main source of capital for investment@*Conclusion@#Family physicians have existing structures and systems in their facilities but improvements on information technologies and networking are needed. They should also ensure affordability of care to patients while ensuring sustainability of facility operations